Publication summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Tribune Chronicle results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 361 hits. Analysis detected 2,467 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,272 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 379 publications). This Tribune Chronicle is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Tribune Chronicle
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%@politifact1%
2%Berkeleyside1%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
0%Tribune Chronicle (selected)0%
Publication details
Total words: 4,272
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 5.6%5.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 4.4%4.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Publication 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos