Author summary
78% 2 analyzed articles/videos 86 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Nelson results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 46% saturation with 225 hits . Analysis detected 1,468 faulty-reasoning hits from 489 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.3% and a BS Rank of 98% (173 of 6,227 authors). This Mike Nelson is worse (more manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group. Mike Nelson
Author details
Total words: 489
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
97% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 97.2% percentile 14.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles489 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 46.0% 46.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 43.6% 43.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 21.9% 21.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 24.5% 24.5% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 15.9% 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 17.0% 17.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 40.5% 40.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 13.7% 13.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 13.3% 13.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 17.6% 17.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 46.0%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 43.6%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 40.5%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 24.5%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 21.9%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 17.6%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 17.0%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Author 15.9%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.7%, sitewide 15.9% False Dilemma: Author 13.7%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.2%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.6%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 2.7% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Horn Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.0% Primacy Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst