Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These The Vindicator results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 553 hits . Analysis detected 2,470 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,808 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 383 publications). This The Vindicator is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 3,808
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 10.1% 10.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 14.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 10.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst