Publication summary
⁠25%2 analyzed articles/videos1,030 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Vindicator results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 730 hits. Analysis detected 4,902 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,898 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (182 of 410 publications). This The Vindicator is worse (more manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group.
The Vindicator
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
⁠0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
⁠1%Brookings1%
⁠1%Capital B News1%
⁠1%Spotlight Delaware1%
⁠1%The Banner1%
⁠56%The Vindicator (selected)3%
⁠99%Utah Hockey Club13%
⁠100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
⁠100%MS NOW Live Events26%
⁠100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
⁠100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
Publication details
Total words: 6,898
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

56% percentile
025507510055.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 10.6%10.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 10.2%10.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Publication 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 10.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos