Keyword summary
0% 17 analyzed articles/videos 8,717 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democrats Elections results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 6,600 hits . Analysis detected 54,378 faulty-reasoning hits from 50,393 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (24,497 of 35,646 keywords). This Democrats Elections is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group. Democrats Elections
Keyword details
Total words: 50,393
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.3% percentile 2.2% BS Score16 analyzed articles50.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst