Topic summary
20% 14 analyzed articles/videos 11,170 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Budgeting results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 3,075 hits . Analysis detected 38,258 faulty-reasoning hits from 51,721 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (15,468 of 16,562 topics). This Budgeting is better (less manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group. Budgeting
Topic details
Total words: 51,721
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score14 analyzed articles51.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst