Author summary
62% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,031 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nathalie Graham results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 1,418 hits . Analysis detected 6,416 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,093 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (2,241 of 6,346 authors). This Nathalie Graham is worse (more manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group. Nathalie Graham
Author details
Total words: 6,093
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.7% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 23.3% 23.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 16.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.9%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Author 8.8%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.5% Tu Quoque: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst