Keyword summary
71% 33 analyzed articles/videos 14,564 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nyc results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 8,054 hits . Analysis detected 72,206 faulty-reasoning hits from 86,080 analyzed words across 33 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (33,539 of 37,536 keywords). This Nyc is better (less manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group. Nyc
Keyword details
Total words: 86,080
Article count: 33
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.6% percentile 1.6% BS Score33 analyzed articles86.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst