Author summary
0%8 analyzed articles/videos2,332 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Isabel Keane results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 1,564 hits. Analysis detected 14,423 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,583 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 23% (4,775 of 6,135 authors). This Isabel Keane is better (less manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group.
Isabel Keane
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
23%Isabel Keane (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 17,583
Article count: 8
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

22% percentile
025507510022.2% percentile
1.8% BS Score8 analyzed articles17.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.1%2.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate