Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,152 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gamaliel Isaac results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 31.9% saturation with 1,470 hits. Analysis detected 8,407 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 85% (958 of 6,244 authors). This Gamaliel Isaac is worse (more manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group.
Gamaliel Isaac
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
85%Gamaliel Isaac (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,608
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

85% percentile
025507510084.7% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 31.9%31.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 19.3%19.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 11.3%11.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 25.4%25.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.3%0.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 5.6%5.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Author 31.9%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 25.4%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 19.3%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.6%, sitewide 15.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos