Author summary
56% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,239 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justin Enriquez results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 2,489 hits . Analysis detected 13,449 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,081 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 40% (3,701 of 6,170 authors). This Justin Enriquez is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group. Justin Enriquez
Author details
Total words: 15,081
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.0% percentile 2.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles15.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.0% 14.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst