Author summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,318 analyzed words
BS Summary: These T. Zeller results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 2,640 hits . Analysis detected 21,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,092 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 23% (4,954 of 6,362 authors). This T. Zeller is better (less manipulative) than 77.90% of the peer group. T. Zeller
Author details
Total words: 25,092
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.1% percentile 1.8% BS Score7 analyzed articles25.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.5% 10.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.5% 10.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst