Author summary
0% 8 analyzed articles/videos 5,277 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heidi Parker results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Unattributed Quote , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 2,428 hits . Analysis detected 17,202 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,569 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,834 of 6,628 authors). This Heidi Parker is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group. Heidi Parker
Author details
Total words: 22,569
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles22.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.9% 6.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.6% 9.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.9%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst