Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These US Deputy Showbusiness Editor results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 1,044 hits . Analysis detected 3,675 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This US Deputy Showbusiness Editor is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. US Deputy Showbusiness Editor
Author details
Total words: 3,312
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 31.5% 31.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 23.2% 23.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Unattributed Quote: Author 31.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Anecdotal: Author 23.2%, sitewide 5.2% Negativity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst