Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,721 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diana Cooper results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Unattributed Quote , and Biased Writer Voice , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 1,090 hits . Analysis detected 7,435 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,140 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (3,658 of 6,244 authors). This Diana Cooper is better (less manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group. Diana Cooper
Author details
Total words: 9,140
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 8.4% 8.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.9% 11.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 11.9%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 8.4%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst