Author summary
58% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,526 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eve Buckland results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 1,470 hits . Analysis detected 11,611 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,053 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (4,987 of 6,170 authors). This Eve Buckland is better (less manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group. Eve Buckland
Author details
Total words: 17,053
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score6 analyzed articles17.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst