Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 998 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deirdre Durkan-Simonds results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Halo Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 525 hits . Analysis detected 4,588 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,994 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 86% (873 of 6,195 authors). This Deirdre Durkan-Simonds is worse (more manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group. Deirdre Durkan-Simonds
Author details
Total words: 2,994
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.9% percentile 5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.5% 8.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 17.3% 17.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 17.5% 17.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 14.2% 14.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 16.4% 16.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.4% 11.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Author 17.5%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 17.3%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Author 16.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.4%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 14.2%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Red Herring: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.6% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst