Author summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos3,405 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marjorie Hernandez results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 3,108 hits. Analysis detected 17,732 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,534 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,039 of 6,229 authors). This Marjorie Hernandez is worse (more manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group.
Marjorie Hernandez
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
52%Marjorie Hernandez (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 15,534
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

51% percentile
025507510051.2% percentile
2.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.8%5.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.0%3.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 20.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.3%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate