Keyword summary
8%8 analyzed articles/videos5,079 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Candidates results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 2,240 hits. Analysis detected 15,019 faulty-reasoning hits from 38,179 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 1% (36,657 of 36,750 keywords). This Candidates is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group.
Candidates
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
1%Candidates (selected)1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.3% percentile
0.8% BS Score8 analyzed articles38.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate