Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,210 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Times Editorial Board results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 25.7% saturation with 1,135 hits . Analysis detected 4,873 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,812 of 6,628 authors). This The Times Editorial Board is worse (more manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group. The Times Editorial Board
Author details
Total words: 4,420
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.7% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 25.7% 25.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.8% 4.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.1% 14.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.8% 8.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.4% 10.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.1%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 25.7%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.4%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Author 8.8%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst