Who's running for Missouri's 6th District? It now includes more of the Northland and Kansas City 7%

By Madeline Fox49%

7/8/2026, 9:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 369 faulty-reasoning hits from 405 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 23.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (20,438 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 93.40% of the article peer group.

Missouri’s redrawn congressional map seems likely to be the one voters will see during the 2026 elections, after it was upheld in the Missouri Supreme Court in late March. 
Secretary of State Denny Hoskins is under pressure from local groups to put a referendum to reverse redistricting on the November ballot after they collected hundreds of thousands of signatures, saying his failure to do so places the legitimacy of the August election in doubt. 
In the new map, the 6th District includes most of the northern part of Missouri. 
With the new 5th District pushed south of the river, the 6th now includes all of Clay and Platte counties and dips down into Kansas City to draw in Columbus Park, Pendleton Heights, Scarritt and North Indian Mound, as well as North Kansas City and Riverside. 
U.S. 
Rep. 
Sam Graves, a Republican, is the current U.S. representative for Missouri’s 6th Congressional District. 
He announced his intention to retire in March, leaving the race open. 
Five Republicans are running to fill Graves’ seat. 
The outgoing congressman has endorsed Chris Stigall, a nationally syndicated radio host from Holt, Missouri, as his replacement. 
That invoked the ire of Kansas City Council member Nathan Willett, who is also running in the Republican primary and has since told St. 
Louis Public Radio he’s “proud” to not have Graves’ sign-off. 
Jim Ingram, a former Army member stationed at Fort Leonard Wood who has also worked in banking and utilities; Cody Oshel, who formerly held pastoral roles with the Missouri United Methodist Church and currently works for Thrivent Financial; and Nathanael Schultz, who owns a restoration business in Bowling Green, Missouri, round out the Republican slate. 
Three Democrats are competing for their party’s nomination, all from the Kansas City metropolitan area. 
The candidates are Liberty architect Josh Smead, Iraq War veteran and service dog trainer Scot Pondelick of Kansas City and Kansas City International Airport transportation security officer Matt Levine. 
The Kansas City Star has reported Levine was accused of asking a former student for naked photos in 2011. 
He then sued for defamation. 
A judge dismissed the charges in 2013. 
Andy Maidment, a former Army and National Guard member who currently works in information technology, is running for the 6th District as a Libertarian. 
Primary elections for Republicans and Democrats in Missouri take place August 4. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 2.2%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 3.6%Columbia Missourian: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 3.5%Madeline Fox: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic3.5%This article: 1.7%Madeline Fox: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Hindsight Bias1.7%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 1.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 5.7%Columbia Missourian: 5.5%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 4.6%Columbia Missourian: 4.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.6%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 21.7%Madeline Fox: 5.9%Columbia Missourian: 5.4%Negativity Bias21.7%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 3.1%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.6%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Madeline Fox: 1.4%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%In-Group Bias3.7%This article: 3.7%Madeline Fox: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.7%This article: 13.1%Madeline Fox: 3.8%Columbia Missourian: 2.4%Halo Effect13.1%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 1.9%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 3.0%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 2.0%Madeline Fox: 0.6%Columbia Missourian: 1.1%False Dilemma2.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 2.9%Columbia Missourian: 3.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 2.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 17.0%Madeline Fox: 3.1%Columbia Missourian: 5.2%Appeal to Emotion17.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 11.1%Madeline Fox: 3.9%Columbia Missourian: 2.6%Anecdotal11.1%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 13.6%Madeline Fox: 1.6%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Unattributed Quote13.6%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 5.1%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Fox: 1.7%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

405 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers19%attributed speech327writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageSam Graves • 14 words • 0.0% coverageSam Graves • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageSam Graves • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageNathan Willett • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 55 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageThe Kansas City Star • 19 words • 0.0% coverageMatt Levine • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

The Kansas City Star

100%flagged-word coverage
19 attributed words24% of attributed speech46% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Unattributed Quote-13.8 ptsWriter: 13.8%The Kansas City Star: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.