Keyword summary
⁠21%4 analyzed articles/videos2,806 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 6th Congressional District results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 866 hits. Analysis detected 6,023 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,941 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (35,530 of 37,530 keywords). This 6th Congressional District is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group.
6th Congressional District
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 10,941
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

5% percentile
02550751005.3% percentile
1.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos