WPLN News12%

Tennessee banned AI in political ads. Why candidates are using it anyway 37%

By Marianna Bacallao11%

7/24/2026, 9:28:22 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 501 faulty-reasoning hits from 283 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 43.3% and a BS Rank of 37% (13,948 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the article peer group.

This year, Tennessee banned political campaigns from using artificial intelligence in their ads without some sort of disclosure. 
Two Republican frontrunners in the race for the 6th Congressional District have used AI to attack the other, but there’s a chance neither will face consequences for violating the new law. 
In an ad for Hilleary, an AI-generated version of Garrett is seen shaking hands with drag queens, laughing with Nancy Pelosi and standing in front of a whiteboard that reads, “Systemic racism is real.” 
“Woke, DEI-loving Johnny Garrett wants to transition Tennessee from conservative to woke,” the ad’s voiceover said. 
The ad intentionally misrepresents Garrett, who has campaigned against DEI and LGBTQ rights. 
Garrett also uses AI in his ad, depicting Hilleary driving a campaign bus into a swamp. 
“Hilleary says he wants to help President Trump drain the swamp. 
Don’t be fooled. 
Send Van packing,” the voiceover said. 
Garrett’s ad never shows Hilleary’s face beyond detailing on the bus, achieving the same effect as having an actor impersonate him. 
Enforcement of the law, in this case, is not up to Tennessee’s Bureau of Ethics and Campaign Finance, a spokesperson told WPLN News. 
For there to be an investigation, a voter either has to complain to a local district attorney or one of the candidates has to sue the other in civil court. 
So far, there’s been no record of a complaint filed in the 6th Congressional District. 
Hilleary and Garrett’s campaigns did not respond to WPLN’s request for comment on whether they would pursue legal action against the other. 
Early voting runs through Aug. 
1. 
Primary election day is Aug. 
6. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.6%Marianna Bacallao: 1.4%WPLN: 2.3%Confirmation Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.7%WPLN: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 17.3%Marianna Bacallao: 2.5%WPLN: 3.8%Availability Heuristic17.3%This article: 7.4%Marianna Bacallao: 1.6%WPLN: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic7.4%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.2%WPLN: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.7%WPLN: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Marianna Bacallao: 7.0%WPLN: 4.0%Framing Effect2.1%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.2%WPLN: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.7%WPLN: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.2%WPLN: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 1.2%WPLN: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 12.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.6%WPLN: 1.0%Pessimism Bias12.0%This article: 18.7%Marianna Bacallao: 8.5%WPLN: 7.4%Negativity Bias18.7%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.8%WPLN: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.5%WPLN: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.2%WPLN: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Marianna Bacallao: 1.8%WPLN: 0.9%In-Group Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.3%WPLN: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 2.4%WPLN: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.4%WPLN: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.0%WPLN: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 1.1%WPLN: 1.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.6%WPLN: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.5%WPLN: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.3%WPLN: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 2.1%WPLN: 3.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 10.6%Marianna Bacallao: 1.5%WPLN: 1.0%False Dilemma10.6%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.2%WPLN: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.3%WPLN: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 16.3%Marianna Bacallao: 4.3%WPLN: 3.9%Hasty Generalization16.3%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.1%WPLN: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.5%WPLN: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 24.7%Marianna Bacallao: 4.8%WPLN: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion24.7%This article: 4.6%Marianna Bacallao: 0.3%WPLN: 0.6%Begging the Question4.6%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 2.8%WPLN: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.2%WPLN: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.1%Marianna Bacallao: 0.0%WPLN: 0.8%Burden of Proof1.1%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.3%WPLN: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 1.5%WPLN: 2.9%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.0%WPLN: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.4%Marianna Bacallao: 3.4%WPLN: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.4%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.0%WPLN: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.0%WPLN: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 12.7%Marianna Bacallao: 2.2%WPLN: 1.5%Unattributed Quote12.7%This article: 12.0%Marianna Bacallao: 1.1%WPLN: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection12.0%This article: 16.6%Marianna Bacallao: 2.8%WPLN: 1.9%Biased Writer Voice16.6%This article: 3.2%Marianna Bacallao: 0.8%WPLN: 0.9%Indoctrination3.2%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.1%WPLN: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.7%WPLN: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marianna Bacallao: 0.2%WPLN: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

283 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.