Topic summary
15% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,810 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Advertising results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 1,021 hits . Analysis detected 7,734 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,967 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (14,213 of 16,562 topics). This Political Advertising is better (less manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group. Political Advertising
Topic details
Total words: 10,967
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles11K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst