Publication summary
56% 10 analyzed articles/videos 6,425 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bridge results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 1,836 hits . Analysis detected 17,296 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,568 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 32% (261 of 379 publications). This Bridge is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 23,568
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.2% percentile 1.5% BS Score10 analyzed articles23.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst