Author summary
10% 1 analyzed article/video 602 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hayley Harding results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 105 hits . Analysis detected 928 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,806 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (3,701 of 6,363 authors). This Hayley Harding is better (less manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group. Hayley Harding
Author details
Total words: 1,806
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.8% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Special Pleading: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.3% Indoctrination: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst