Did your candidate drop out? How to change vote in Michigan 11%

By Hayley Harding10% Votebeat10%

7/21/2026, 3:20:18 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Loss Aversion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 825 faulty-reasoning hits from 602 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 27.3% and a BS Rank of 11% (19,036 of 21,176 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 89.90% of the article peer group.

A mural on the street outside of the Detroit Department of Elections ahead of the 2024 primaries in Detroit, Michigan. 
Absentee voters in Michigan who turn in a ballot and later realize a problem can spoil the ballot and revote. 
(Elaine Cromie / Votebeat) 
This article was originally published by Votebeat , a nonprofit news organization covering local election administration and voting access. 
Sign up for Votebeat Michigan’s free newsletter here. 
You did everything right: You voted early, putting that absentee ballot in the mail or dropping it in a local drop box to ensure your vote was counted. 
Then your candidate dropped out. 
What on earth are you supposed to do now? 
Many Michigan voters may be asking that question this month after Democratic Senate candidate Mallory McMorrow and Republican gubernatorial candidate Mike Cox both suspended their campaigns. 
Mail ballots for the Aug. 4 primary have been available since late June, so there are almost certainly McMorrow and Cox supporters who have already voted. 
If you’re one of those people, all is not lost. 
Michigan law gives you the right to cancel (or, in legal parlance, spoil) your ballot and cast a new one. 
You don’t even need to give a reason why  so it doesn’t matter if it’s because your candidate dropped out or because you realized too late there was some other problem with your ballot. 
Mike Cox drops out of Michigan governor race, endorses John James 
El-Sayed vs. 
Stevens: What to know about Michigan’s most interesting primary 
Mallory McMorrow ends Senate campaign, narrowing Michigan Democratic primary 
How to spoil your ballot depends on whether you’ve already submitted it. 
If so, you’ll need to sign and submit a written request to your township or city clerk (not your county clerk!) 
by the end of the day on Friday, July 24. 
That’s the day your request needs to be received by the clerk  not the day it needs to be postmarked. 
That date may seem kind of early, but it makes sense when you consider other parts of Michigan election law. 
Statewide early voting begins Saturday, July 25. 
And communities with more than 5,000 people are allowed to start preprocessing absentee ballots eight days before the election, which for the primary is Monday, July 27. 
Preprocessing allows for everything but the actual counting of the votes  taking in the ballots, verifying signatures, opening the envelopes, and even putting ballots in the tabulator, which will eventually scan and count them. 
As soon as your absentee ballot is removed from its envelope, it is no longer tied to you, so it can’t be taken back or changed. 
Clerks largely appreciate the option to process ballots before Election Day, because it means faster results, but it does limit your window to request a new ballot. 
If you’ve already filled out your ballot but not yet turned it in, you have a few more options. 
You can go in person to an early voting location or to your polling place on Election Day and surrender your absentee ballot, at which point election workers will spoil it and give you a new one to vote there and then. 
Alternatively, you can go to your local clerk’s office and fill out the same written, signed request to spoil your unsubmitted absentee ballot and get a new one. 
Hayley Harding is a reporter for Votebeat based in Michigan. 
Contact Hayley at hharding@votebeat.org . 
Votebeat is a nonprofit news organization covering local election integrity and voting access. 
Sign up for their newsletters here . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 3.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Hayley Harding: 1.1%Bridge: 1.1%Anchoring Bias3.3%This article: 7.6%Hayley Harding: 2.5%Bridge: 3.1%Availability Heuristic7.6%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Hayley Harding: 1.4%Bridge: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias4.3%This article: 0.8%Hayley Harding: 1.8%Bridge: 7.0%Framing Effect0.8%This article: 10.1%Hayley Harding: 3.4%Bridge: 0.4%Loss Aversion10.1%This article: 2.0%Hayley Harding: 0.7%Bridge: 0.9%Status Quo Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.5%Hayley Harding: 3.7%Bridge: 2.4%Optimism Bias9.5%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Hayley Harding: 2.5%Bridge: 7.5%Negativity Bias7.5%This article: 4.7%Hayley Harding: 1.6%Bridge: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias4.7%This article: 4.3%Hayley Harding: 1.4%Bridge: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error4.3%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Hayley Harding: 1.4%Bridge: 0.9%In-Group Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Hayley Harding: 2.8%Bridge: 1.1%Halo Effect8.5%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.3%Hayley Harding: 1.4%Bridge: 1.6%Recency Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.6%Hayley Harding: 4.5%Bridge: 2.8%Appeal to Authority13.6%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 1.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.6%Hayley Harding: 4.3%Bridge: 3.9%Hasty Generalization8.6%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.8%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.8%Hayley Harding: 3.1%Bridge: 5.0%Appeal to Emotion7.8%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.8%Hayley Harding: 0.3%Bridge: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.8%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 1.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 1.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.5%Hayley Harding: 3.5%Bridge: 2.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.5%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.4%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 3.5%Hayley Harding: 1.2%Bridge: 0.2%Special Pleading3.5%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 1.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 17.4%Hayley Harding: 5.8%Bridge: 3.9%Biased Writer Voice17.4%This article: 1.0%Hayley Harding: 0.3%Bridge: 2.2%Indoctrination1.0%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hayley Harding: 0.0%Bridge: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Hayley Harding: 2.5%Bridge: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.5%

602 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers8.5%attributed speech551writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageElaine Cromie • 4 words • 0.0% coverageVotebeat • 19 words • 100.0% coverageVotebeat • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageVotebeat • 13 words • 0.0% coverageVotebeat • 7 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Votebeat

100%flagged-word coverage
47 attributed words92% of attributed speech62% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Biased Writer Voice+24.8 ptsWriter: 15.6%Votebeat: 40.4%40.4%Attempt to Sell a Product +31.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Votebeat: 31.9%31.9%Indoctrination-1.1 ptsWriter: 1.1%Votebeat: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.