Topic summary
⁠9%1 analyzed article/video602 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Voter Information results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 928 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,806 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (10,818 of 16,562 topics). This Voter Information is better (less manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.
Voter Information
Topic details
Total words: 1,806
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510034.7% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Special Pleading: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Indoctrination: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos