Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Paula Gardner results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 394 hits . Analysis detected 1,311 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,229 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This Paula Gardner is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Paula Gardner
Author details
Total words: 2,229
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Horn Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst