Author summary
78% 1 analyzed article/video 777 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Keith Kindred results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Indoctrination , and Slippery Slope , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 334 hits . Analysis detected 2,368 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,331 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,566 of 6,350 authors). This Keith Kindred is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group. Keith Kindred
Author details
Total words: 2,331
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.4% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 8.5% 8.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.3% 14.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.6% 13.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Author 9.6%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Slippery Slope: Author 8.5%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Composition/Division: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst