Author summary
16% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,517 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Isabel Lohman results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 247 hits . Analysis detected 1,944 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,551 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 12% (5,635 of 6,363 authors). This Isabel Lohman is better (less manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group. Isabel Lohman
Author details
Total words: 4,551
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst