Publication summary
54% 16 analyzed articles/videos 8,886 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bridge results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 2,692 hits . Analysis detected 27,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 38,763 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 22% (313 of 400 publications). This Bridge is better (less manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group. Bridge
Publication details
Total words: 38,763
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.8% percentile 1.4% BS Score16 analyzed articles38.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst