Author summary
67% 2 analyzed articles/videos 801 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Gibbons results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 544 hits . Analysis detected 3,907 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,867 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 48% (3,479 of 6,628 authors). This Lauren Gibbons is better (less manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group. Lauren Gibbons
Author details
Total words: 4,867
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.5% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.2% 11.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.1% 7.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Straw Man: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst