Gretchen Whitmer endorses Haley Stevens: She’ll ‘get things done’ for Michigan 77%

By Lauren Gibbons67%

7/24/2026, 12:32:20 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 199 hits. Analysis detected 1,089 faulty-reasoning hits from 801 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 68.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (5,205 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the article peer group.

Michigan Gov. 
Gretchen Whitmer on Friday endorsed fellow Democrat Haley Stevens for Michigan’s open US Senate seat. 
(AP photos) 
Gov. 
Gretchen Whitmer backs US Rep. 
Haley Stevens in Michigan US Senate race 
Stevens is locked in a tight battle with progressive Abdul El-Sayed 
Whitmer had been sitting on the sidelines of the race but hinted earlier in the week she might endorse 
DETROIT  Gov. 
Gretchen Whitmer on Friday endorsed Haley Stevens over Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan’s fiercely competitive Democratic US Senate primary, arguing the fourth-term member of Congress can “get things done” in Washington. 
Citing tariffs on foreign goods, federal Medicaid cuts and high gas prices, Whitmer said Stevens is taking on Trump and congressional Republicans and “putting money back in Michiganders’ pockets.” 
“As governor, I’ve had one strategy: get things done, and that strategy informs everything that I do,” Whitmer said in a video endorsement. 
“Just like me, Haley will do whatever it takes to get things done for the people of Michigan, and we need her now more than ever.” 
I am absolutely thrilled to have Gov @GretchenWhitmer ’s endorsement for U.S. 
Senate. 
She is a champion for our state, she understands the stakes of this race and why it’s so important we elect the strongest Dem in this primary, and she gets stuff done for Michigan. 
Let’s go win! 
pic.twitter.com/NfFtlD2IWu 
- Haley Stevens (@HaleyforMI) July 24, 2026 
The governor joined Stevens and former US Rep Jim Clyburn later Friday at the Teamsters Local 337 hall in Detroit, telling the union crowd that “there are few leaders…with more fight in them than Haley Stevens.” 
Pro-Stevens groups erase El-Sayed fundraising edge in Senate race 
Fact-check: How much money did Haley Stevens get from DTE? 
Fact-check: Millionaire claims in Abdul El-Sayed, Haley Stevens race 
Stevens said she was “absolutely thrilled” to have Whitmer’s endorsement, adding in a statement that she “understands the stakes of this race and why it’s so important we elect the strongest Dem in this primary.” 
A spokesperson for El-Sayed noted voters will ultimately decide the primary election, not endorsements. 
“The corporate establishment has closed ranks and made their pick  now, Michigan voters will get to make theirs,” said Roxie Richner. 
‘Making fun of Michigan’ 
Whitmer, who is term-limited out of office at the end of the year, had previously avoided weighing in on the Aug. 4 primary between Stevens and El-Sayed, who are facing off in one of the most high-profile federal races in the country. 
Experts have called the primary a litmus test of the future direction of the Democratic Party. 
Stevens has a relatively moderate record in Congress, while El-Sayed is a former public health official who has championed progressive policies like Medicare for All. 
Whitmer had hinted earlier in the week she might break her silence on the Senate race, telling reporters she was concerned about some of the intra-party rhetoric and  ugliness  that had emerged. 
Michigan Gov. 
Gretchen Whitmer joiined Haley Stevens at a Detroit campaign event on Friday shortly after endorsing her. 
Speaking Friday, Whitmer said she “heard a lot of people talk smack” about her voice when she first ran for governor. 
“I think Haley might have me beat on this one,” she quipped, referencing online talk about Stevens’ thick Michigan accent. 
Stevens herself addressed what she called the “cool kid chatter” online, telling supporters that anyone making fun of how she sounds are “making fun of Michigan.” 
“They’re thinking they’re better than us, and what they don’t know is I am your voice, and their jokes and their criticism only makes me fight harder,” she said. 
Whitmer’s endorsement means Stevens now has the backing of all living Michigan Democratic governors. 
Jennifer Granholm and Jim Blanchard previously endorsed her. 
El-Sayed, who ran for governor against Whitmer in 2018, has scored several high-profile endorsements from progressive figureheads, including US Sen. 
Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Rep. 
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York. 
Recent disclosures show El-Sayed has outraised Stevens, but outside groups have poured money into the race  most of it to support Stevens. 
Whoever wins in August will get the chance to take on Republican Mike Rogers in the fight for Michigan’s open US Senate seat. 
Outgoing Democratic US Sen. 
Gary Peters recently endorsed Stevens in the race to take his place. 
Whitmer’s endorsement is significant. 
While she has frustrated some Michigan Democrats by working with Republicans and vetoing union-backed bills , she’s remained relatively popular with voters for a second-term governor. 
A May poll conducted for the Detroit Regional Chamber showed 52.2% of Michigan voters approved of Whitmer’s work, compared to 39% who disapproved. 
“When Michigan’s back is up against the wall, Haley Stevens steps forward, and she steps up,” Whitmer said Friday in Detroit. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.6%Lauren Gibbons: 3.5%Bridge: 3.0%Confirmation Bias3.6%This article: 2.9%Lauren Gibbons: 0.5%Bridge: 1.2%Anchoring Bias2.9%This article: 7.4%Lauren Gibbons: 2.1%Bridge: 3.0%Availability Heuristic7.4%This article: 2.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.8%Bridge: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic2.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.0%Bridge: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.5%Bridge: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Lauren Gibbons: 8.2%Bridge: 6.8%Framing Effect4.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.0%Bridge: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.1%Bridge: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.0%Bridge: 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.5%Lauren Gibbons: 1.1%Bridge: 2.3%Optimism Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.0%Bridge: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 24.8%Lauren Gibbons: 4.8%Bridge: 7.0%Negativity Bias24.8%This article: 14.9%Lauren Gibbons: 3.0%Bridge: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias14.9%This article: 3.2%Lauren Gibbons: 1.2%Bridge: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error3.2%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.0%Bridge: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%Lauren Gibbons: 4.4%Bridge: 1.6%In-Group Bias9.6%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.0%Bridge: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 12.2%Lauren Gibbons: 7.4%Bridge: 1.9%Halo Effect12.2%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.0%Bridge: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.0%Bridge: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.4%Bridge: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Lauren Gibbons: 0.9%Bridge: 0.2%Primacy Effect5.2%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.0%Bridge: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 2.8%Bridge: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 1.7%Bridge: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.7%Lauren Gibbons: 7.1%Bridge: 3.4%Appeal to Authority0.7%This article: 2.6%Lauren Gibbons: 0.4%Bridge: 1.0%False Dilemma2.6%This article: 2.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.3%Bridge: 1.2%Slippery Slope2.0%This article: 2.9%Lauren Gibbons: 0.9%Bridge: 0.2%Circular Reasoning2.9%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 5.7%Bridge: 4.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.0%Bridge: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.2%Lauren Gibbons: 2.7%Bridge: 0.9%Bandwagon5.2%This article: 16.4%Lauren Gibbons: 11.2%Bridge: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion16.4%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 1.1%Bridge: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.0%Bridge: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.0%Bridge: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.0%Bridge: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.0%Bridge: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.0%Bridge: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 1.0%Bridge: 1.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.0%Bridge: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.2%Lauren Gibbons: 0.7%Bridge: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.2%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.0%Bridge: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.0%Bridge: 0.3%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.0%Bridge: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.0%Bridge: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.9%Bridge: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.3%Bridge: 0.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.5%Lauren Gibbons: 2.9%Bridge: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection1.5%This article: 3.7%Lauren Gibbons: 0.9%Bridge: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice3.7%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.0%Bridge: 1.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.0%Bridge: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lauren Gibbons: 0.0%Bridge: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Lauren Gibbons: 0.7%Bridge: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.2%

801 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers51%attributed speech396writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageGretchen Whitmer • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageGretchen Whitmer • 5 words • 0.0% coverageGretchen Whitmer • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageGretchen Whitmer • 30 words • 100.0% coverageGretchen Whitmer • 29 words • 0.0% coverageGretchen Whitmer • 23 words • 0.0% coverageGretchen Whitmer • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageGretchen Whitmer • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageHaley Stevens • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageRoxie Richner • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageGretchen Whitmer • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageGretchen Whitmer • 21 words • 0.0% coverageGretchen Whitmer • 20 words • 0.0% coverageHaley Stevens • 26 words • 0.0% coverageHaley Stevens • 29 words • 0.0% coverageHaley Stevens • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageGary Peters • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageGretchen Whitmer • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Roxie Richner

100%flagged-word coverage
22 attributed words5.4% of attributed speech61% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -8.6 ptsWriter: 8.6%Roxie Richner: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.0 ptsWriter: 3.0%Roxie Richner: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.