Topic summary
73% 14 analyzed articles/videos 5,825 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Senate Race results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 3,143 hits . Analysis detected 34,858 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,083 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (11,575 of 16,562 topics). This Us Senate Race is better (less manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group. Us Senate Race
Topic details
Total words: 30,083
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score14 analyzed articles30.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst