Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 825 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KIMBERLEE KRUESI results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 553 hits . Analysis detected 3,001 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,248 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,682 of 6,532 authors). This KIMBERLEE KRUESI is better (less manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group. KIMBERLEE KRUESI
Author details
Total words: 5,248
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.5% 10.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Horn Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst