RedState91%

Michigan Democrat Senate Candidate Squirms After CNN Drops Receipts on His 'Defund the Police' Record 83%

By Sister Toldjah91%

7/13/2026, 9:25:59 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 41.2% saturation with 304 hits. Analysis detected 2,667 faulty-reasoning hits from 738 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 74.3% and a BS Rank of 83% (3,870 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 82.30% of the article peer group.

The leading Democrat in the Michigan Senate primary race has a dishonesty problem. 
Now, I know this is a thing with pretty much every Democrat. 
But in the case of Abdul El-Sayed, he's so "extra" in this department that even Democrat-compliant media outlets are calling him out on it. 
For instance, during a recent interview with Zeteo media company founder and ex-MSDNC host Mehdi Hasan, the former Wayne County health department director was grilled on why he chose to call himself a "physician" when he wasn't one. 
As RedState reported, Hasan noted that "you don’t have a valid state medical license in New York or Michigan, which apparently is what you need legally to call yourself a physician."  El-Sayed, who does have a Doctor of Medicine degree from Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, incredulously proclaimed that his words didn't matter. 
"At the end of the day, it’s not about whether or not I’m a physician or a doctor,"  he stated before diving into a canned response about healthcare and education. 
SEE ALSO:&nbsp;<em>The Michigan Senate Race Is Heating Up - and So Is the Scrutiny of Abdul El-Sayed</em> 
As we also reported, CNN, too, called out the Bernie Sanders-backed candidate for repeatedly claiming he had never advocated for defunding the police, something they found was wildly false after digging and finding interviews from 2020 where he talked extensively about it. 
El-Sayed had also posted tweets supporting the Defund the Police movement that he deleted before he declared his Senate candidacy. 
On Sunday, El-Sayed sat down for an interview with CNN, where he promptly got agitated when their network correspondent, Manu Raju, dropped receipts on him and asked him to explain why he was saying now that he never called for it even though it "sounded like you did in the past." 
El-Sayed &nbsp;then went on a bizarre rant about how defund supposedly didn't mean what we know it means: 
"You know, what's interesting about that comment is I go as far as defining what I mean by that," El-Sayed said. 
"Do you disagree with investing in libraries and public services and social services? 
You fixate on the word 'defund,' but what I’m talking about is war material that we made too much of during the war in Iraq. 
And then, because we had too much of it, we had to find somewhere to sell it. 
So we sold it to a whole bunch to local police departments."&nbsp; 
[...] 
"Now, if you want to keep talking about one particular word that was in vogue that I tried to define at the time, sure. 
But I think if we're having a serious conversation about public safety, you'll see that my perspective is in keeping with exactly what most people who are rational about this question are talking about, and what they want." 
What these Defund the Police proponents always leave out is the fact that when they call for more investment in social services and the like, what they usually want to do is fund it by yanking hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars, from police department budgets. 
We've seen it happen in blue cities like Oakland and Los Angeles with disastrous results. 
DIVE DEEPER:&nbsp;<em>Democrats Should Shut Up and Listen to Oakland Police Chief's Emotional Response to Devastating Budget Cuts</em> 
The Defund the Police movement will always be toxic for Democrats, so some of the ones who still believe in it have had to try and come up with a way around it by playing word games and suggesting defunding does not mean what the American people know it means. 
I always go back to what Democrat Rep. 
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14), who has endorsed El-Sayed, once said about defunding the police after New York City fell short of fully doing so when Democrat Bill de Blasio was mayor: 
"Defunding police means defunding police,” the congresswoman said in a statement. 
“It does not mean budget tricks or funny math." 
I think that just about says it all. 
Editor’s Note: The 2026 Midterms will determine the fate of President Trump’s America First agenda. 
Republicans must maintain control of both chambers of Congress. 
Help RedState continue to report on the Democrats’ radicalism and inform voters as our nation faces a crossroads. 
**Join RedState VIP** and use promo code **FIGHT** to receive 60% off your membership. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 27.1%Sister Toldjah: 9.9%RedState: 7.0%Confirmation Bias27.1%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.0%RedState: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Sister Toldjah: 3.1%RedState: 3.4%Availability Heuristic2.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.6%RedState: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 2.0%Sister Toldjah: 1.8%RedState: 0.9%Hindsight Bias2.0%This article: 1.1%Sister Toldjah: 0.6%RedState: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias1.1%This article: 4.1%Sister Toldjah: 8.4%RedState: 9.2%Framing Effect4.1%This article: 1.2%Sister Toldjah: 0.6%RedState: 0.5%Loss Aversion1.2%This article: 1.2%Sister Toldjah: 0.1%RedState: 0.4%Status Quo Bias1.2%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.0%RedState: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.4%RedState: 1.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Sister Toldjah: 1.5%RedState: 1.7%Pessimism Bias1.8%This article: 41.2%Sister Toldjah: 19.6%RedState: 13.9%Negativity Bias41.2%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 3.1%RedState: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 3.4%RedState: 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 1.3%RedState: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 13.6%Sister Toldjah: 5.0%RedState: 4.7%In-Group Bias13.6%This article: 11.4%Sister Toldjah: 4.0%RedState: 3.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias11.4%This article: 3.3%Sister Toldjah: 0.2%RedState: 2.0%Halo Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 1.7%RedState: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 12.6%Sister Toldjah: 1.6%RedState: 1.2%Recency Bias12.6%This article: 1.1%Sister Toldjah: 0.2%RedState: 0.5%Primacy Effect1.1%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.1%RedState: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 22.6%Sister Toldjah: 11.4%RedState: 6.9%Ad Hominem22.6%This article: 2.4%Sister Toldjah: 2.2%RedState: 2.6%Straw Man2.4%This article: 22.0%Sister Toldjah: 3.5%RedState: 3.3%Appeal to Authority22.0%This article: 5.0%Sister Toldjah: 2.7%RedState: 2.4%False Dilemma5.0%This article: 6.8%Sister Toldjah: 0.5%RedState: 1.4%Slippery Slope6.8%This article: 1.5%Sister Toldjah: 0.2%RedState: 0.2%Circular Reasoning1.5%This article: 14.9%Sister Toldjah: 9.4%RedState: 10.1%Hasty Generalization14.9%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.8%RedState: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.1%Sister Toldjah: 1.2%RedState: 0.9%Bandwagon5.1%This article: 19.9%Sister Toldjah: 10.4%RedState: 8.5%Appeal to Emotion19.9%This article: 1.1%Sister Toldjah: 2.5%RedState: 1.8%Begging the Question1.1%This article: 4.7%Sister Toldjah: 1.4%RedState: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.7%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.0%RedState: 0.9%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 8.3%Sister Toldjah: 2.3%RedState: 1.2%Burden of Proof8.3%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.0%RedState: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 1.6%Sister Toldjah: 0.1%RedState: 0.3%Composition/Division1.6%This article: 4.7%Sister Toldjah: 1.4%RedState: 2.6%Anecdotal4.7%This article: 13.3%Sister Toldjah: 1.0%RedState: 0.3%No True Scotsman13.3%This article: 7.9%Sister Toldjah: 3.2%RedState: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.9%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 9.9%Sister Toldjah: 1.5%RedState: 0.2%Personal Incredulity9.9%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.8%RedState: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.4%RedState: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.7%Sister Toldjah: 2.2%RedState: 2.4%Unattributed Quote11.7%This article: 5.7%Sister Toldjah: 2.9%RedState: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection5.7%This article: 36.7%Sister Toldjah: 24.7%RedState: 21.5%Biased Writer Voice36.7%This article: 10.3%Sister Toldjah: 5.5%RedState: 4.8%Indoctrination10.3%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.0%RedState: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 17.3%Sister Toldjah: 21.9%RedState: 15.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias17.3%This article: 4.3%Sister Toldjah: 3.7%RedState: 3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.3%

738 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers23%attributed speech568writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 55 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 51 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageEl-Sayed • 21 words • 0.0% coverageEl-Sayed • 13 words • 0.0% coverageEl-Sayed • 25 words • 0.0% coverageEl-Sayed • 17 words • 0.0% coverageEl-Sayed • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageEl-Sayed • 24 words • 0.0% coverageEl-Sayed • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageAlexandria Ocasio-Cortez • 11 words • 0.0% coverageAlexandria Ocasio-Cortez • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
20 attributed words12% of attributed speech97% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Biased Writer Voice-47.7 ptsWriter: 47.7%Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -22.5 ptsWriter: 22.5%Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-15.1 ptsWriter: 15.1%Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-13.4 ptsWriter: 13.4%Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-7.4 ptsWriter: 7.4%Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.6 ptsWriter: 5.6%Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.