Topic summary
⁠94%2 analyzed articles/videos738 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defund The Police Movement results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 25.9% saturation with 1,519 hits. Analysis detected 9,857 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,854 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (6,059 of 16,562 topics). This Defund The Police Movement is worse (more manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group.
Defund The Police Movement
Topic details
Total words: 5,854
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.4% percentile
3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 25.9%25.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.4%11.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.9%16.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.4%11.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 25.9%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos