Keyword summary
â 76% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,198 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michigan Senate Race results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 2,612 hits . Analysis detected 20,683 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,107 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of â 45% (20,676 of 37,536 keywords). This Michigan Senate Race is better (less manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group. Michigan Senate Race
Keyword details
Total words: 16,107
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.9% percentile 2.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles16.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 16.2% 16.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Politically Right Leaning⌠Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst