Keyword summary
60% 13 analyzed articles/videos 4,326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Senate results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 4,448 hits . Analysis detected 35,778 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,713 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (26,175 of 35,675 keywords). This Us Senate is better (less manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group. Us Senate
Keyword details
Total words: 34,713
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.6% percentile 2.1% BS Score13 analyzed articles34.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst