Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,349 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wyatt Feist results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 690 hits. Analysis detected 5,619 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,396 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,183 of 6,628 authors). This Wyatt Feist is worse (more manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group.
Wyatt Feist
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
52%Wyatt Feist (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,396
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

52% percentile
025507510052.0% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.8%12.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.1%5.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.2%10.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 5.9%5.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Author 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos