Author summary
81% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,996 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Tait results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 1,653 hits . Analysis detected 10,439 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,729 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,163 of 6,358 authors). This Robert Tait is worse (more manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group. Robert Tait
Author details
Total words: 9,729
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.3% percentile 2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.7% 13.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.8% 10.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.6% 6.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst