Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,105 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shah Meer Baloch results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 720 hits. Analysis detected 4,407 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (2,088 of 6,382 authors). This Shah Meer Baloch is worse (more manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group.
Shah Meer Baloch
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠68%Shah Meer Baloch (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,420
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

67% percentile
025507510067.3% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.2%7.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 11.5%11.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.8%9.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 16.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos