Canada ready to ‘intensify’ trade talks as Trump reportedly prepares to hit more countries with new tariffs  US politics live 56%

By Shrai Popat41% Tom Ambrose33% Alice Speri81% Robert Tait81%

7/21/2026, 1:14:11 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 30 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.4% saturation with 217 hits. Analysis detected 1,972 faulty-reasoning hits from 891 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.6% and a BS Rank of 56% (9,648 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the article peer group.

Defense secretary Pete Hegseth, joint chiefs of staff chairman Dan Caine and agriculture secretary Brooke Rollins are also scheduled to speak today. 
They’ll testify in front of lawmakers on the Senate appropriations committee about Trump’s $88bn supplemental funding request, which would help pay for the war in Iran. 
This is the first time we've heard from Hegseth and Caine extensively since consecutive days of strikes restarted against Iran this month. 
Lindsey Graham’s funeral will take place in Washington on 28 July, and will include a short ceremony at the US Capitol in the Rotunda, before a full service at Washington National Cathedral for invited guests. 
Donald Trump is set to speak at the funeral, alongside others that are yet to be announced. 
Graham’s remains will the be transported to South Carolina for a service at the state house on 29 July, followed by a procession in the capital, Columbia. 
There will be a ceremony open to the public, before a private family burial in Pickens County, where Graham was born and raised. 
President Donald ⁠Trump is poised to unleash fresh ⁠tariffs on ⁠dozens of countries as soon as ⁠this week, the Financial Times reported on ⁠Tuesday, with his temporary 10% global ‌tariff ‌scheduled to expire on ‌Friday. 
The FT said the most immediate new duties are expected to be on a ‌par with the 10% tariffs currently ​in place, but the administration was also working on other ⁠investigations that could grant ​it the ​legal authority ​to propose ​higher ‌duties. 
Reuters could ​not ​immediately verify the report. 
Lebanese president Joseph Aoun was to meet with his US counterpart Donald Trump in Washington on Tuesday, as Beirut’s military moved into an area of the south under a deal with Israel to disarm Hezbollah. 
Lebanon is under pressure to prove that it can and will disarm the Iran-backed militant group, which Israel has set as a precondition for ending its occupation in southern Lebanon. 
The so-called “pilot zones” where the Lebanese army is deploying under the deal with Israel are primarily located just outside territory Israeli forces invaded after Hezbollah dragged Lebanon into the Middle East war in March. 
Hello and welcome to the US politics live blog. 
Canadian prime minister Mark Carney has said that Ottawa is ready to deepen trade talks with the United States, after US president Donald Trump ordered fresh tariffs targeting Canada. 
“This is the latest in a series of unilateral US trade actions that began with the US imposing a series of tariffs in direct violation of the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement,” Carney said of Trump’s plan for 50% duties on many Canadian products. 
He added that Canada has made proposals to resolve disputes as Washington transformed its trade ties, and is “ready to intensify those discussions.” 
Trump’s tariffs will hit a wide range of products, the White House said, including wine, hockey sticks and cement. 
They also include goods previously protected from import taxes under the United States-Mexico-Canada (USMCA) agreement. 
The new tariffs will exclude energy products, fish, critical minerals and potash. 
They also exclude products already subject to tariffs aimed at protecting national security, such as steel and aluminum. 
The White House said the tariffs will go into effect in 30 days, leaving time for possible negotiations between the two countries. 
Trump signed three proclamations to launch the tariffs under Section 338 of the 1930 Trade Act. 
Several Democratic lawmakers last year proposed repealing the section because they said Trump could use it to destabilize the economy. 
A White House fact sheet claims Trump is “taking action to hold Canada accountable for its continued discrimination against and unreasonable and unequal treatment of U.S. commerce that has burdened and disadvantaged hardworking Americans”. 
Trump claims in the proclamations that Canada discriminates against American automobiles, alcohol and cheese relative to other nations, but his argument rests in large part on retaliatory actions taken by Canada after the US president imposed tariffs on Canada under the pretext that it should do more to stop fentanyl smuggling into the US. 
Read the full story here: Donald Trump to impose 50% tariff on most Canadian goods, White House says. 
In other developments: Canadians across the political spectrum united in anger at Trump. 
“If these tariffs proceed, Canada should respond tariff for tariff, dollar for dollar,” Ontario premier Doug Ford said. 
Canada’s prime minister, Mark Carney, called the tariffs a “direct violation” of the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement Trump negotiated. 
Canada’s Conservatives called the tariffs “another unacceptable and unjustified attack on Canadian workers and our businesses,” adding: “Canadians are not a punching bag.” 
The leader of Canada’s New Democrats called them “the latest economic grenade thrown over the border by an out of control President who has lost touch with reality.” 
Ilya Somin, a professor of law at George Mason University who helped file the successful challenge to Donald Trump’s “liberation day” tariffs, points out, the president’s new 50% tariffs on Canadian imports “are based on Section 338 of the notorious 1930 Smoot-Hawley tariff legislation, which severely exacerbated the Great Depression.” 
Nancy Mace, a Republican congresswoman from South Carolina, announced on Monday that she is not entering the race to replace the late senator Lindsey Graham in the snap Republican primary next month. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.0%Shrai Popat: 1.4%the Guardian: 3.7%Confirmation Bias13.0%This article: 4.7%Shrai Popat: 0.5%the Guardian: 0.6%Anchoring Bias4.7%This article: 2.5%Shrai Popat: 2.6%the Guardian: 3.1%Availability Heuristic2.5%This article: 0.0%Shrai Popat: 0.6%the Guardian: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Shrai Popat: 1.5%the Guardian: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Shrai Popat: 1.5%the Guardian: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 9.9%Shrai Popat: 8.2%the Guardian: 6.1%Framing Effect9.9%This article: 3.8%Shrai Popat: 0.1%the Guardian: 0.6%Loss Aversion3.8%This article: 3.7%Shrai Popat: 0.2%the Guardian: 0.6%Status Quo Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Shrai Popat: 0.1%the Guardian: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.1%Shrai Popat: 1.3%the Guardian: 2.5%Optimism Bias5.1%This article: 2.6%Shrai Popat: 0.5%the Guardian: 2.1%Pessimism Bias2.6%This article: 20.4%Shrai Popat: 8.5%the Guardian: 10.4%Negativity Bias20.4%This article: 9.9%Shrai Popat: 1.9%the Guardian: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias9.9%This article: 9.4%Shrai Popat: 0.7%the Guardian: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error9.4%This article: 0.0%Shrai Popat: 0.4%the Guardian: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Shrai Popat: 0.6%the Guardian: 1.3%In-Group Bias4.8%This article: 3.9%Shrai Popat: 0.6%the Guardian: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Shrai Popat: 0.3%the Guardian: 3.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Shrai Popat: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Shrai Popat: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.8%Shrai Popat: 0.9%the Guardian: 1.2%Recency Bias4.8%This article: 3.3%Shrai Popat: 0.3%the Guardian: 0.4%Primacy Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Shrai Popat: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Shrai Popat: 2.6%the Guardian: 2.0%Ad Hominem3.1%This article: 0.0%Shrai Popat: 0.4%the Guardian: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.5%Shrai Popat: 3.0%the Guardian: 3.8%Appeal to Authority12.5%This article: 2.0%Shrai Popat: 0.8%the Guardian: 1.7%False Dilemma2.0%This article: 4.7%Shrai Popat: 1.5%the Guardian: 1.1%Slippery Slope4.7%This article: 0.0%Shrai Popat: 0.2%the Guardian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.5%Shrai Popat: 3.1%the Guardian: 6.3%Hasty Generalization1.5%This article: 0.0%Shrai Popat: 0.1%the Guardian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.0%Shrai Popat: 0.7%the Guardian: 0.7%Bandwagon4.0%This article: 13.2%Shrai Popat: 5.2%the Guardian: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion13.2%This article: 3.8%Shrai Popat: 1.3%the Guardian: 0.9%Begging the Question3.8%This article: 21.3%Shrai Popat: 2.8%the Guardian: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)21.3%This article: 0.0%Shrai Popat: 0.2%the Guardian: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.3%Shrai Popat: 0.5%the Guardian: 0.4%Burden of Proof4.3%This article: 0.0%Shrai Popat: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Shrai Popat: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Shrai Popat: 0.4%the Guardian: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Shrai Popat: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 16.8%Shrai Popat: 0.9%the Guardian: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)16.8%This article: 0.0%Shrai Popat: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Shrai Popat: 0.1%the Guardian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Shrai Popat: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 2.0%Shrai Popat: 0.1%the Guardian: 0.1%Special Pleading2.0%This article: 0.0%Shrai Popat: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Shrai Popat: 1.7%the Guardian: 1.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 3.8%Shrai Popat: 0.5%the Guardian: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection3.8%This article: 24.4%Shrai Popat: 5.5%the Guardian: 10.4%Biased Writer Voice24.4%This article: 0.0%Shrai Popat: 0.4%the Guardian: 1.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Shrai Popat: 2.9%the Guardian: 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Shrai Popat: 1.6%the Guardian: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Shrai Popat: 0.1%the Guardian: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.0%

891 words analyzed.

Speakers

10speakers54%attributed speech414writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageFinancial Times • 35 words • 100.0% coverageFinancial Times • 42 words • 0.0% coverageReuters • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageMark Carney • 29 words • 0.0% coverageMark Carney • 42 words • 0.0% coverageMark Carney • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWhite House • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWhite House • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWhite House • 34 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 54 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Ford • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMark Carney • 19 words • 0.0% coverageCanada’s Conservatives • 23 words • 100.0% coverageCanada’s New Democrats • 28 words • 0.0% coverageIlya Somin • 50 words • 100.0% coverageNancy Mace • 32 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
54 attributed words11% of attributed speech58% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+94.9 ptsWriter: 5.1%Donald Trump: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.3 ptsWriter: 4.3%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.