Topic summary
78% 40 analyzed articles/videos 21,966 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tariffs results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 12,583 hits . Analysis detected 113,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 91,113 analyzed words across 40 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (10,290 of 15,364 topics). This Tariffs is better (less manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group. Tariffs
Topic details
Total words: 91,113
Article count: 40
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.0% percentile 2.3% BS Score40 analyzed articles91.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.5% 12.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.1%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst