Author summary
74% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,640 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Walker results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.8% saturation with 2,994 hits . Analysis detected 10,820 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,733 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (2,854 of 6,260 authors). This John Walker is worse (more manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group. John Walker
Author details
Total words: 9,733
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.4% percentile 2.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 30.8% 30.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 6.7% 6.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 30.8%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.7%, sitewide 0.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst