Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,692 analyzed words
BS Summary: These George Chidi results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 1,518 hits . Analysis detected 12,467 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,023 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,729 of 6,353 authors). This George Chidi is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group. George Chidi
Author details
Total words: 10,023
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.1% percentile 2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles10K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.2% 15.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.5% 14.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst