Speaker summary
74% 4 analyzed articles/videos 146 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roxie Richner results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 51% saturation with 150 hits . Analysis detected 669.685 faulty-reasoning hits from 146 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (20,261 of 28,364 speakers). This Roxie Richner is better (less manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group. Roxie Richner
Speaker details
Total words: 146
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.6% percentile 18.1% BS Score4 analyzed videos146 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 42.6% 42.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 45.7% 45.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 51.0% 51.0% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 24.1% 24.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 22.6% 22.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 14.6% 14.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 11.2% 11.2% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 9.5% 9.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 19.0% 19.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 51.0%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 45.7%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Speaker 42.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 26.9% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 0.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 6.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 1.4% Tu Quoque: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 3.3% Special Pleading: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 0.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst