Topic summary
64% 17 analyzed articles/videos 7,918 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Endorsements results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 4,478 hits . Analysis detected 39,712 faulty-reasoning hits from 37,875 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 25% (11,574 of 15,297 topics). This Political Endorsements is better (less manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group. Political Endorsements
Topic details
Total words: 37,875
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score17 analyzed articles37.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.8% 11.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst