Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Rebecca Buis results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 233 hits . Analysis detected 1,731 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,764 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,219 authors). This Rebecca Buis is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Rebecca Buis
Author details
Total words: 2,764
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.4% 7.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.3% 3.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Special Pleading: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.3% Primacy Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Nature: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst